The Emerging Age of Irrationality

Today, Kita shared this fascinating article with me about the effort to eliminate thinking and the teaching of thinking in the education industry.  Apparently, the GOP believes that a thinking public is detrimental to GOP success and control.

I don't have much to say about it except that I support the teaching of critical thinking - I think it is critical to a successful life and society.  

The teaching of fairy tales as real is interesting.  It would be good, I think, if we taught the concepts and history behind fairy tales as well as their perceived and actual impact on society.  That would likely be more interesting than the fairy tales themselves.

Texas GOP Declares: "No More Teaching of 'Critical Thinking Skills' in Texas Public Schools"

Saturday, 07 July 2012 08:03 By Danny Weil, Truthout | News Analysis

Texas Textbooks.Textbooks, which are assigned and shared, in a classroom at Hutto High School in Hutto, Texas, April 5, 2012. (Photo: Ben Sklar / The New York Times)The Republican Party of Texas has issued their 2012 political platform and has come out and blatantly opposed critical thinking in public schools throughout the state. If you wonder what took them so long to actually state that publicly, it is really a matter of timing. With irrationality now the norm and an election hovering over the 2012 horizon, the timing of the Republican GOP announcement against "critical thinking" instruction couldn't be better.  It helps gin up their anti-intellectual base.
The Texas GOP's declarative position against critical thinking in public schools, or any schools, for that matter, is now an official part of their political platform. It is public record in the Republican Party of Texas 2012 platform. With regard to critical thinking, the Republican Party of Texas document states: "Knowledge-Based Education - We oppose the teaching of Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) (values clarification), critical thinking skills and similar programs that are simply a relabeling of Outcome-Based Education (OBE) (mastery learning) which focus on behavior modification and have the purpose of challenging the student's fixed beliefs and undermining parental authority." (page 20, Republican Party of Texas, 2012).
Yes, challenging beliefs or claims is considered insubordinate, immoral and could lead to rebellion, disobedience or perhaps worse: revolution. For the Republican Party and their followers, thinking is subversive, imagination is a sin and the Republican Party in Texas and elsewhere is working to codify this into public policy. The plutocrats can't have a working-class citizenry that is asking questions of those in power, be they parents or bosses; instead, the people must be taught the ideology of what is morally acceptable, what rules and regulations to follow. and even more importantly, how to accept and internalize hierarchical authoritarianism. Critical thinking is a direct challenge to the "leaders" and their claims on authority, and any opposition to vertical arrangements is ethically unacceptable to those in power.
Reactionaries have long known that enshrining ignorance and hierarchy in both thought and practice within the school curriculum is essential if the control of young minds is to be accomplished softly and quietly yet profoundly through propaganda and perception management. In the quarters of obedience training, "education" has nothing to do with "schooling" under capitalism.
Read more: The Public Intellectual
This thinking is not new. The ideological underpinnings for such repugnant beliefs sorrowfully tread back throughout the history of the 20th century and undoubtedly before. William Bagley's book, "Classroom Management," published in 1907 and widely used as a teacher-training manual throughout America in the early 1900s, was so highly praised at the time that it went through 30 printed editions. The book echoed the morbid thinking of many so-called Gilded Age educators at the time. One such passage from the book sums up the thinking regarding children and childhood: "One who studies educational theory aright can see in the mechanical routine of the classroom the educative forces that are slowly transforming the child from a little savage into a creature of law and order, fit for the life of civilized society."
Law and order is what counts, and critical education, of course, seeks to subject all laws and claims to order to the lens of critical scrutiny, something the powerful disdain. Schooling under the neofeudalistic capitalist relations that are now emerging in the new Gilded Age of the 21st century is no different than in the past, where learning how not to think critically was the norm. The Texas GOP is simply creating the new conditions for a technological form of Plato's Cave with zero tolerance and the school-to-prison pipeline.
The Republican Party platform gets worse when it comes to prohibiting thinking critically about science or the scientific method. Take the section on " controversial theories," found on page 20:
Controversial Theories - We support objective teaching and equal treatment of all sides of scientific theories. We believe theories such as life origins and environmental change should be taught as challengeable scientific theories subject to change as new data is produced. Teachers and students should be able to discuss the strengths and weaknesses of these theories openly and without fear of retribution or discrimination of any kind.
Alternative beliefs such as creationism are now cleverly invited into the curriculum as so-called science or theories to debunk the purportedly false notions of the theory of evolution. But if critical thinking is not to be used in the classroom, how would these beliefs be examined for evidence? Science, the scientific method, critical thinking and the process of subjecting claims to evidentiary experimentation - all related activities - pose a threat to self-proclaimed power and the harbingers of supernaturalism.
IDEA Public Schools
One of the purveyors of such rubbish is Texas educational retail chain IDEA Public Schools. IDEA is a retail charter outfit that standardizes curriculum downwards, away from critical thinking, embracing instead rote memorization and regurgitation, or what I call the "anorexic/bulimic" learning model of intellectual atrophy, ossification, and decay.
IDEA is a 501(c)3 nonprofit organization. This status was obtained for tax purposes, and it would take another article to demonstrate how nonprofit status has been hijacked by special interests (charter schools in this case) in the interest of profit extraction.  In fact, IDEA Public Schools is public only because it takes public subsidies to stay alive.
IDEA's board members include representatives from JPMorgan, Teach for America, International Bank of Commerce, Wells Fargo and other Wall Street banking concerns. In spite of the fact that the board of IDEA is filled with Wall Street banking interests, IDEA says it works to assure students get what they call a "core curriculum." Critical thinking is never even mentioned in the IDEA core curriculum - let alone entertained in IDEA classrooms, either by faculty or students; instead, IDEA is devoted to turning education into a commodity, students into customers mounted with saddlebags for tax funds that subsidize IDEA and turn schools into fortresses of profit.
According to IDEA's online blurb, the company is all about growth and expansion using taxpayer monies to grease the wheel: "In addition to its exemplary academic achievement, IDEA is moving forward with growth and expansion efforts to help serve more students throughout the Valley and Central Texas. IDEA currently enrolls over 9,000 students, with campuses in ten communities throughout the Rio Grande Valley. When all IDEA schools are at full scale (serving students in K-12th grade), IDEA will serve 15,000 from communities throughout the Rio Grande Valley."
The company is moving across the Texas prairie, taking down traditional public schools like locusts consuming wheat fields. Keeping with the Republican platform, they promise to make obedience training and anti-intellectualism the cornerstone and foundation of education in Texas, to the detriment of students and society.
The Age of Irrationality and the Abdication of Reason
In the case of the Texas Republican Party, they have really upped the stakes. Supernaturalism and supernatural beliefs no doubt will continue to snake their way into public school lesson plans, and as Texas will have significant impact on the content of all the nation's texts through its textbook purchasing power, we may find that the tale of the Loch Ness Monster is now told to children as if it were a true story in science classes. Don't laugh! This is now the case in Louisiana where, as The Washington Post reported, "A biology textbook used by a Christian school in Louisiana that will be accepting students with publicly funded vouchers in the fall says that the Loch Ness Monster in Scotland is real. And it isn't just any monster but a dinosaur - an effort to debunk evolution and bolster creationist theory."
Remember: In Louisiana, taxpayer money is given in the form of school vouchers so that parents can now see their tax monies spent on a supernatural curriculum bent on teaching that the Loch Ness Monster and other fairy tales are true.
All of this can be seen as part and parcel of the emerging Age of Irrationality, the hemorrhaging of a post-literate society where reason is abdicated in favor of irrationality and appeals to supernaturalism. The sad part is that all of this is now encouraged, by forces bent on enslaving the minds of children, as the new "curriculum circus" in schools.
In the New Digital Dark Ages, where the landscape is packed with scurrilous corporate politicians on the take, textbook companies clawing for educational profits, and tent preachers looking for a congregation of sheep-le and a quick Elmer Gantry buck, the people who suffer are students, teachers and the average citizen.
It Doesn't Stop There
Prohibitions against thinking critically or scientifically comprise just one of 30 pages of the anti-Enlightenment thinking seen in the Texas GOP platform document. Here is some more of its chilling content:
  •  Abstinence-only sex education
  • Trying juveniles as adults
  • Emphasis on faith-based drug rehab
  • Opposition to the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child
  • Flat-rate income tax
  • Repeal of the minimum wage
  • Opposition to homosexuality in the military
  • Opposition to red light cameras
  • Opposition to the Employment Non-Discrimination Act, because firms should be able to fire people for what they consider "sinful and sexually immoral behavior."
  • Continued opposition to ACORN (even though it has not existed since 2010!)
  • Opposition to statehood or even Congressional voting rights for the citizens of the District of Columbia
  • And no-questions-asked support for Israel because, and this is another direct quote: "Our policy is based on God's biblical promise to bless those who bless Israel and curse those who curse Israel and we further invite other nations and organizations to enjoy the benefits of that promise."

This is corporate American culture and education today, or at least a great and growing part of it. Learning to identify assumptions and differentiating them from facts, questioning assumptions in light of evidence, engaging in wonder and inquiry, exchanging other points of view in an atmosphere of civility and inquiry (especially entertaining those points of view one does not agree with), learning the art of critical self reflection, asking for evidence for claims made by oneself and others, and testing hypotheses through the development of methods and protocols of thinking - opposition to all of this has emerged from the Texas GOP's "hidden curriculum" and is now under the magnifying glass of scrutiny - and secured a place in the Texas Republican platform.
This is not only a telling moment for a complex empire in spiraling decline, but also a frightening moment, for we can see evolution transformed into devolution and schools converted into the supernatural rabbit holes that lead to Alice-in-Wonderland gated communities of ignorance governed by a chilling hierarchy of totalitarianism and fear.


  1. Anonymous4:40 PM

    All I can do is feel sorry for the kids in Texas. Their entire lives will be spent in searching through the "acceptable" 20th century knowledge for answer to problems that have leaped into the 21st century.I pray that at some point many will find a voice (college or work) that will awakening them to reality. I do not object to their values being firmly planted on old time acceptable standards, but I do object to a failure to make a timely assessment of those values. The truth is most secondary students have a very unorganized and shallow value system. They need and deserve better.

  2. When reading an article I think it is important to try to understand the concepts that the person who wrote the article is using, in order to better understand their position and to see if they are being intellectually honest.
    In looking at this article (like I do any article I read from any source) when they start throwing around acronyms my radar detector (or should I say bullshit detector) comes on, as should yours, and I am off on a hunt to discover if the is accurately and completely representing what they are about. Further, I am skeptical when anyone assigns the worst possible motive to what people say, or suggest that the obvious meaning is the one they assigned when they know that is not what was meant. The article you sighted is guilty of both of these intentional distortions of the facts.
    Beginning with the acronyms they mention two things in the article one OBE (Outcome Based Education) and HOTS (Higher Order Thinking Skills). Sounds fairly innocuous, but what does it mean, he like most people who use these acronyms count on you either being ignorant of the meaning and assigning your own natural meanings too them, or that you support his political agenda. If you are in the latter group his article is really not aimed at you (that would be singing to the choir). His target is the first group and his agenda is to persuade you in this case that Republicans are against critical thinking, and that he and his group (which in this case is Truthout.org a liberal group (I could add my own slant by saying liberal propaganda outlet)) is for critical thinking. The way this article is presented makes me think he wants you to accept his version of things without any intellectual discussion of the merits of his position or theirs and without any critical thinking on the reader’s part, but I digress.

  3. Looking at the first OBE (Outcome Based Education), what are the objections to this sounds ok, seems that we are looking at the outcome what could be wrong with that? A lot actually, it is in fact one of the reasons why two of my children struggled with reading (see whole word reading). Yet to see some problems with it should not be taken to mean the whole thing is wrong. The main focus of the article was HOTS (Higher Order Thinking Skills) which is a teaching method that focuses on Benjamin Blooms cognitive domains taxonomy of knowledge’s top three levels of analysis, synthesis and evaluation without, as I believe the Republicans are charging here and others have charged as well, establishing a base of knowledge first. In other words they want the students to analyze, synthesize and evaluate things that they might not fully comprehend. Looking back at Blooms taxonomy, you will find that underlying this higher order thinking skills are knowledge, comprehension and application (or in other words the things we send our kids to school for). So the complaint against HOTS (which has been around since the 50s) is that it tends to cause students to form opinions without factual knowledge of the subject.
    He says the Republicans are against critical thinking then he inadvertently lets his cat out of the bag by showing that he believes that some of his “liberal orthodoxies” are above challenge (god does not exist and man-made global warming is a fact not to be challenged with new scientific evidence), and that the Republicans belief that students should be able to challenge this without discrimination is somehow against critical thinking.

    Controversial Theories - We support objective teaching and equal treatment of all sides of scientific theories. We believe theories such as life origins and environmental change should be taught as challengeable scientific theories subject to change as new data is produced. Teachers and students should be able to discuss the strengths and weaknesses of these theories openly and without fear of retribution or discrimination of any kind.’

    When one reads just this without all the propaganda posed by the author, it seems a lot less problematic. These Saul Alinsky tactics that easily fool people